News

Virulently Homophobic Singers Banned from U.S.

by Kilian Melloy
Monday Apr 5, 2010
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (9)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
Anti-gay musician Capleton saw his U.S. appearances canceled earlier in the year; now, five other "murder musicians" have reportedly had their U.S. visas canceled
Anti-gay musician Capleton saw his U.S. appearances canceled earlier in the year; now, five other "murder musicians" have reportedly had their U.S. visas canceled  

A handful of Jamaican dancehall artists have had their U.S, visas canceled and will reportedly not be coming into the country.

An April 2 article at Petrelis Files.com cites the Jamaican media as reporting that five performers of so-called "murder music"--dancehall songs that advocate the killing of gays--will not be allowed to enter the U.S. Bounty Killer, Mavado, Beenie Man, Adonia and Ricky Trooper have all had their visas canceled, reported the story, and while no official explanation has been forthcoming from the State Department, the story says that speculation centers on two possible explanations. One theory is that the musicians are not being allowed in due to the content of their material. The other is that the canceled visas are a response to the refusal on the part of the Jamaican government to accede to U.S. extradition requests regarding Christopher "Dudus" Cokes on drug-running charges.

Anti-gay reggae musician Buju Banton was the subject of a boycotting campaign during a tour he undertook last year in the U.S., to promote his newest album release. One of Banton’s signature songs is "Boom Bye Bye," which describes shooting gay men in the head and incinerating their dead bodies. Banton was later arrested in Florida on drug charges.

"Although the details behind the decision to revoke the visas of several murder-musicians isn’t yet clear, we welcome this development," the article quoted Brett Lock of the U.K.-based GLBT equality organization OutRage! "The singers have been given every opportunity to reject their murderous incitements to attack gays and lesbians and yet few have been willing to turn their backs on violently homophobic lyrics and instead chose to play a cat-and-mouse game with campaigners and promoters," added Locke.

The Jamaican press had depicted Banton as the victim of "gay lynch mobs" in the U.S., but Locke said that anti-gay artists merit no sympathy. "They themselves buy gay-hatred first; career second," he stated, adding, "Any obstacle between them and the lucrative North American market is to be welcomed. If this harms their careers, good! There should be no market for violent bigotry anyway."

GLBT site Queerty.com also reported on the story, asking, "Where are the names of Buju Banton and Capleton?" Banton is still being detained by U.S. authorities on cocaine charges, but Capleton’s American tour was canceled earlier this year by the tour’s producer. Capleton’s scheduled appearances at the Ragga Muffins Music Festival in California were also scrubbed, with festival co-producer Moss Jacobs telling the press, "We can’t put people on the show who are advocating violence against any group of people." The cancellation came after GLBT groups spoke out against Capleton’s anti-gay song lyrics.

"We thank the venues and promoters who denied Capleton a platform after learning about his history of violent lyrics, but at the end of the day promoters need to become better educated about the talent they are elevating," said GLAAD’s Rashad Robinson in the wake of the cancellation.

Kilian Melloy serves as EDGE Media Network’s Assistant Arts Editor, writing about film, theater, food and drink, and travel, as well as writing a column. His professional memberships include the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association, the Boston Online Film Critics Association, the Independent Reviewers of New England (IRNE) and the Boston Theater Critics Association (also known as the Elliot Nortons).

Comments

  • patroy, 2010-04-05 16:56:44

    Finally our government does something smart!!!!!


  • James McConnell, 2010-04-05 17:26:18

    ’UNITED WE STAND, DIVIDED WE FALL’ SO I SAY THANKS TO BANNING THEM.


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-06 17:24:08

    Whether the ban is as a result of the homophobic rhetoric of these musicians or retaliation by the US over the Dudus issue, I am absolutely delighted that their foreign platform used to incite violence against the LGBT community, has been denied them. Maybe this will provide the opportunity for self evaluation on their part!!


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-06 20:41:33

    The gay community is using their hatred of Jamaica and Reggae music to create a platform to promote and proagate themselves.These guys are so full of themselves they will go to the extent of trying to deny the people of Jamaica their capacity to earn a living.Reggae music is Jamaica’s bread and butter, it drives all other major sectors of the economy and therefore employs hundred of thousands of Jamaicans.When you try to stop people’s ability to earn you are telling them to go and die.Hatred breathes Hatred and Jamaicans will fight back.These so called hate songs are nothing but punchline which nobody in Jamaica takes seriously, so i think there is a big misunderstanding of Jamaican culture or just plain racism.Banning the artist is wrong.


  • Phillip Klepacki, 2010-04-07 15:26:41

    To Anonymous, 2010-04-06 20:41:33: No one is denying these musicians their opportunity to use their art to make a career. What they are being denied is the opportunity to promote and incite violence against gays. Of course, your whole argument is weakened by your claim that the gay community has some sort of united hatred against Jamaica and Reggae music, which simply isn’t true. (And if it is, substantiate it - I want evidence.) If you really believe that no one in Jamaica takes these songs seriously, then you should really do some research into anti-gay violence there. In the future, please try to make a reasoned argument, not one which claims that gays reacting to anti-gay lyrics will bring the downfall of an entire country.


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-07 21:31:21

    Anonymous, it’s about damn time someone spoke out against this culture of hatred against gays in the Jamaican culture. Where else would you suggest the stand be taken? The message must be felt where it counts most; in their bank-books. It’s a minute step in a country where efforts abound to silence homosexuals, often ultimately. If these musicians who promote bigotry against their own because of sexual orientation are banned, they are writing their own message of death. Prevention of their ability to earn is not final; they have a great opportunity to recognize that politics can help or hurt and change their violent lyrics. As huge as the music industry is in Jamaica is in terms of the numbers of jobs it provides, it would have been short-sighted if the opportunity were not utilized to full advantage. If you believe no one in Jamaica takes the vocal derogation of gays in Jamaica seriously, you are in denial.


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-08 09:41:05

    YEAH! It’s time to get rid of the First Amendment here in the US - isn’t that what you’re all calling for? Rather than understand why - you simply use people like Buju Banton as your poster-boys for anti-gay, you help promote hate for a culture that is overall non-hating and very loving. There are gays in this country and there are FAGS - you are the FAGS - I hope that every day your rights are infringed more than the next, so long as you call for equal retaliation - PRAISE JAH - RASTAFARI!


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-08 16:31:47

    Free Speech is not being denied. The State Department is simply saying that if a person or business entity uses the right of Free Speech to abridge the rights and freedoms of others, they will not be allowed visas to enter the United States. All right come with responsibility so a prudent person or business entity has the responsibility that he/she/it does not use language that could be construed as inciting and/or condoning harm to another person or group. Your comment includes the characterizations, "gays and fags". I am neither. When my rights are abridged I have and will continue to defend them too. Praise God, Who judges us all!


  • Anonymous, 2010-04-11 02:51:17

    The State Department HAS NOT SAID ANYTHING. They have NOT given a single reason for the visa revocations. That should not be acceptable in a free country. If their visas were revoked because there was a problem with their lyrical content, then the US government of all governments should have the courage to say so. In a free country these artists should also have the right to defend themselves if they’re being punished because a government department claims they are violating rights or inciting something. But how can you defend yourself or face your accuser if you’re never even told why you are being punished or given an opportunity to present your side? Please stop cheering this as some victory for the LGBT community. The State Department has not given the slightest hint that these actions were taken for the benefit of the community, and the way it’s been handled is not in line with guarantees of liberty and justice that the community is seeking. You can cheer when something ill befalls those you dislike, but don’t pretend that what happened to them, was done for your benefit. I think the idea that a country that allows radicals from around the globe preaching the death of the entire country, would suddenly block entrance of a select group because of lyrics against the LGBT community, is overreaching. I don’t believe for a moment that it’s a credible explanation. America is not the UK, the government does not attempt to decide for the public what content is pre-approved for their consumption. The US does not block artists because they don’t like what they have to say. There is no UK like agency, with someone deciding that this specific artist or speaker is bad for the public or the country. It makes no sense that that was the motivation behind the visa revocations. Applying diplomatic pressure to have an alleged drug lord extradited, or to have the artist pay their tax obligations, seem to be far more likely and credible reasons for this incident. Those reasons are also far more in line with what would be expected from the State Department. What should also concern the community is that even the perception that their artists are being attacked for their opinions, simply hardens the community and base that supports them. Even for those fans who like their music and don’t care either way about specific lyrics, this type of commentary simply makes them feel that they’re under attack also for daring to like a certain type of music or artist. In short, you’re losing the battle for hearts and minds on this topic, even as the artists lose revenue. I think this may be proven if a hit song or two result from this drama.


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook