News

Could Ill. Same-Sex Couples Win Civil Unions?

by Kilian Melloy
Tuesday Aug 24, 2010
  • PRINT
  • COMMENTS (4)
  • LARGE
  • MEDIUM
  • SMALL
Greg Harris
Greg Harris  

Same-sex couple in the land of Lincoln could be looking at the prospect of seeing their families enjoy a measure of legal recognition, if the Illinois state legislature approves a bill to provide for civil unions in a November session.

But although the bill reportedly has the support it needs to pass both the house and senate and go to the state’s governor, lawmakers caution that greater equality for same-sex families may not be a top priority, reported local newspaper the Lincoln Daily News on Aug. 24.

"I would like to do this as soon as possible," the bill’s sponsor, openly gay Democratic state Rep. Greg Harris, told the press. "But every member of the General Assembly has two priorities on their mind right now: jobs and the economy, and the terrible state the budget is in."

The article noted that one state, New Jersey, currently allows civil unions for same-sex families. The governor of Hawaii recently vetoed legislation that would have extended civil unions to gay and lesbian families. Seven states allow varying degrees of recognition for same-sex families under domestic partnership provisions. Five states and the District of Columbia allow for full-fledged marriage equality on the state level. A sixth state, California, rescinded marriage equality at the ballot box in 2008, but that ballot initiative was recently stuck down as unconstitutional; the case is being appealed, and further marriages in California have been placed on hold. In Maine last year, a similar defeat derailed a state law that would have granted marriage parity. A 1996 federal law, the so-called "Defense of Marriage" Act, denies gay and lesbian couples any federal recognition.

If the civil unions bill were to clear the state’s house and senate and be signed into law by Gov. Pat Quinn--who is thought likely to sign the bill, should it reach his desk--gay and lesbian families in Illinois would then enjoy the same state-level rights and protections that married couples are granted.

For anti-gay activists, however, that is a sticking point. "It’s counterfeit marriage by another name," David Smith, the executive director of anti-gay group the Illinois Family Institute, declared. "It’s a steppingstone to full same-sex marriage." The article noted that the Illinois Family Institute attempted in 2006 to put the rights of gay and lesbian families before voters with a ballot initiative that would have amended the state constitution in such a way that same-sex couples would have been legally locked out of marriage rights. The group was unsuccessful at gathering enough signatures to qualify the initiative for inclusion on the ballot, however.

The November session will convene after the midterm elections. At that point, even if the Democrats lose their current majority in the house and senate, they may well vote to send the bill to the governor, also a Democrat. A situation similar to that very scenario played out last year in New Jersey, when state lawmakers declined a final opportunity to advance a bill that would have granted marriage equality to same-sex families in that state before outgoing Gov. Jon Corzine was succeeded by anti-gay Gov. Chris Christie.

Gov. Quinn’s campaign website speaks of Quinn "supporting equal marital rights," with text at the site saying, "Governor Quinn believe the committed relationships of same-sex couples deserve the same basic recognition rights that are currently extended to married heterosexual couples--including the right to act as next of kin, the right to assist their partners in times of emergency, the right to equal health insurance and other employment benefits, and the right to equal treatment in property and inheritance." Those issues would likely be addressed by the civil unions bill.

While the issue of marriage equality is still politically sensitive, it has become much more socially accepted. An Aug. 22 Examiner.com article noted that a recent poll by the Chicago Tribune found support for marriage parity tied with opposition to it, with each side weighing in at 42%.

By opting to pursue civil unions instead of marriage equality, however, supporters say that legislators have given the bill a chance at passing. "We’re nowhere near equal marriage rights, but a civil union bill would pass," said Equality Illinois’ Rick Garcia, going on to add, "This issue is not a big deal."

Kilian Melloy serves as EDGE Media Network’s Assistant Arts Editor, writing about film, theater, food and drink, and travel, as well as writing a column. His professional memberships include the National Lesbian & Gay Journalists Association, the Boston Online Film Critics Association, the Independent Reviewers of New England (IRNE) and the Boston Theater Critics Association (also known as the Elliot Nortons).

Comments

  • Anonymous, 2010-08-24 16:59:45

    "’It’s counterfeit marriage by another name,’ David Smith, the executive director of anti-gay group the Illinois Family Institute, declared." ...thus exposing the "I’m all for equality, I’m no bigot, just don’t call it marriage" types for the liars they are.


  • Anonymous, 2010-08-25 02:55:57

    If same sex unions are ok, why can’t we just include group unions amongst people also? Man with multiple men or multiple women, or a woman with multiple women or multiple men.


  • Anonymous, 2010-08-25 09:54:25

    If "this issue is not a big deal" then why not just bring it up for a vote now? Sure, many feels the economy and jobs may be the priority right now, but surely the IL legislature can do more then 1 things at a time. I just don’t want to see IL do to their same-sex couples what NJ did to us here just 7 months ago. We were told "just wait until after the elections, it’s no big deal". That was until a new Republican govenor was elected and he put pressure on the Republican lawmakers to deny us marriage equality. It was one big slap in the face for all of us that were told "just wait until after the election". An election can change everything, don’t let them do that to you too in IL.


  • Anonymous, 2010-08-25 10:02:34

    To the individual asking about allowing group unions. The two issues are not the same thing. We’re not asking for multiple partners, we just want to marry/civil union a single partner. If you feel so strongly in favor of polygamy then you do the hard work that same-sex couples have done try to advance your cause. But please do not try to confuse the two issues, they are NOT the same thing, no matter how much you want to equate the two!


Add New Comment

Comments on Facebook